Ultra Low-Cost Laser Rangefinders Actualized by Neato Robotics

Ultra-Low-Cost Laser Rangefinder Atop Neato Robotics XV-11 Vacuum Cleaner

A commercially-available ultra low-cost laser rangefinder is finally set to hit department store shelves in February!  I'm speaking of the laser rangefinder presented at ICRA 2008 that costs $30 to build (commented on here at Hizook almost one year ago) that sits atop the recently announced Neato Robotics XV-11 vacuum cleaner.   Others have thoroughly discussed the XV-11's competitiveness with iRobot products, the possible patent infringement of iRobots square-front design, and its ability to perform SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping).  But everyone has glossed over the coolest part:  Forget the $400 robot, $60 batteries, $30 wheels (etc.) available for pre-order on Neato's website... if made available, sub-$100 laser rangefinders would revolutionize hobby robotics!  Read on for a description of this compelling (future?) component.

Neato sponsored an ICRA 2008 research paper entitled, "A Low-Cost Laser Distance Sensor," that detailed the design of laser rangefinder that costs only $30 to build.  Called the "Revo LDS", it is pictured below.

Low Cost Laser Rangefinder  Low Cost Laser Rangefinder via Triangulation

Unlike the more expensive (many thousands of dollars) laser rangefinders that use time of flight measurements, such as those discussed here and here, the Revo LDS triangulates the distance to an object using a fixed-angle laser pointer and a CMOS imager, with a known baseline between the two.  To quote:

A compact, rigid point-beam triangulation module incorporating laser, imager, and electronics. With a low-cost CMOS imager and a DSP for subpixel interpolation, we get good range resolution out to 6 m with a 5 cm baseline, at a 4 KHz rate. The key insight to the Revo is that high precision is possible with a small baseline, because of the digital image sensor.

A motor spins the unit at 10Hz to give a full 360-degree field of view.  An optical encoder gives 1-degree angular accuracy.  Not exactly Earth-shattering, but simple and low-cost.  An enclosed, robust USB version of this sensor would have broad appeal, and open up the world of hobby robotics to a sensor that is ubiquitous on research robots.  Oh, and  I suppose the XV-11 isn't half-bad either:

I seriously hope that Neato makes the laser rangefinder component available separately, but it is currently not listed on their website for purchase.  At the moment, I am a bit worried about the possibility of litigation due to similarities between the XV-11 and an iRobot patent (see below).  Hopefully they see the light and avoid destructive lawsuits.

Neato Vacuum Cleaner    iRobot Patent

 

While I'm on the topic...  The idea of triangulating distances using lasers and cheap CMOS/CCD imagers is by no means new.  My favorite example is Morgan Quigley's "Borg Scanner" from Stanford's STAIR Lab.  The Borg Scanner performs triangulation along an entire line (plane) simultaneously using the exact same technique.  Scanning a green laser-line across a scene produces dense 3D point clouds.  You can see a few photos and a video of it being used below.  A forthcoming ICRA 2009 paper on the scanner entitled "High-Accuracy 3D Sensing for Mobile Manipulation: Improving Object Detection and Door Opening" is also quite good.  I've heard rumors that design and fabrication details for this sensor is going to be released as "open source"; I am anxious to give it a try.

Borg Scanner Distance Sensor  Borg Scanner Distance Sensor Scan

 

Whether a commercial unit or home-brewed open source initiative, it appears that ultra low-cost laser rangefinders are on the horizon.  Next on the wish-list: low-cost flash LADAR -- perhaps Microsoft's Project Natal will deliver...?

 

Comments

I am wondering if it is a good idea to replace the motor with a line laser. Do you think some people will live with ~45 degrees scope if the module is really cheap?
—sk (not verified)

@sk

I'm not really sure I follow your question.   Are you referring to the Revo LDS or the Borg Scanner?

—Travis Deyle

I mean Revo LDS. Something like

http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200110/vision.htm

I wonder why there is no commercialized product like this. Those image sensors in the cell phones and web cameras are high quality and inexpensive. Personally I would like to make such a product...

—sk (not verified)

@sk

Ah yes, that is exactly how the Borg Scanner operates.  The only difference: they are scanning the line laser around to create full 3D point clouds rather than just a planar scan.

 

—Travis Deyle

Any idea what the part number of their or a similar cmos imager is?  All I gather is that a line is 752 pixels wide, it has a global shutter, minimum exposure time of 35 microseconds, can collect at least 10 lines of data at 4 KHz, and costs south of $30 (at least in quantity). 

Or can most any cmos imager be driven at high frame rates while sacrificing vertical resolution?

binarymillenium (not verified)

Not sure what imager that might be... maybe this guy from Aptina: http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=557-144...

I'm not sure what kind of frame rate it could achieve if only ten lines are being read.

voiceafx (not verified)

i also wonder if its possible to run a normal image sensor at high frame rates with just a few lines resolution

 

the processor neato uses is a bf531 from analog devices - something like srv-1

—Anonymous (not verified)
Hi It is interesting. Do you know where can I buy this sensor Revo LDS?
—kai (not verified)

Using a linear array ( Perkin Elmer, Hamamatsu, Aptina ... )  is a simple and cheap way to build a triangulation sensor if youʻre only interested in planar mapping ( parallel to the floor in this case ). You can run the array faster and the system is more data efficient than using a 2d imager. A little trig ( or a LUT ) and youʻve got range values at  nearly the  array scan rates.  Rotate sensor and you get a polar map. Itʻs 30 year old tech but can be a nice package. 

You can do the same with 2D imagers but most wonʻt let you select lines or ROIs.  You wait for the frame and throw out the data youʻre not interested in.  But you can use Walmart parts instead of specialized industrial components and spend your budget on software/processors.   For $30, 2d imaging is probably what theyʻre using.

Cylindrical optics and a good bandpass filter would help a lot with data reduction in both cases but compensating for low light returns ( scattering, shiny curves, dark things, etc... ) can be a little tricky. 

 Good, fast, cheap... pick two.

From a cleaning perspective, I wonder how you get the thing to clean under the bed and other scanner shadow areas?

 

—Greg (not verified)

Hi,

I am not sure if my question is exactly relavant. I am looking for 2d range finders with a scanning range of about 10m for planar mapping. An angular accuracy of about 0.5 degree would be apt with a scanning frequency of about 4KHz. I want to use such a range finder to get contours of moving objects(humans, cycles) from a height of about 10 meters.

Till now I could only zero in upon companies like Sick and Reigl. But these scanners are way beyond the budget allocated for my final year project. 

Please reply, if  you know of anything similar which would meet my requirements.

Arigato

—Akhilesh (not verified)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options